All posts by Phil Rack

Phil Rack, Owner of MineQuest Business Analytics, LLC. Grand Rapids, MI USA For more than twenty five years, I've worked as a SAS Consultant, specializing in the financial industry. My motives for this blog are to inform and educate other consultants as well as clients who use SAS or WPS and how they can more effectively use technology to further their business objectives.

Improving Screen Time – Workplace Ergonomics

I spend a lot of time in front of a monitor looking at reports, source code, web pages and videos. Over the years I’ve developed a real interest in ways to make my work environment more comfortable and whether you consider it to be an element of age I’ve noticed that my vision is not as sharp as I remember.

I’ve gone the gamut by buying larger screens monitors to trying glasses made specifically for the length I sit from the monitor I seem that I get eye fatigue after just a few hours. At one point a few years ago my eyes would start to go cross-eyed at the end of the day. I’d have to focus at distant objects for quite a while so my eyes wouldn’t go crossed when I looked back at the monitor.

I’ve recently started trying out some computer glasses that are clip-ons and are tinted yellow and are blue light blocking. When I first started out using them I was unimpressed. It took me a few hours to adjust to the tint but after that, the contrast is much higher. Text is clearer and easier for me to read.

The specific glasses I bought are clip-on’s and are called the GameKing Classic. They really have made a difference for me. I just keep them clipped on a pair of reading glasses that are corrected for the distance that I sit between the monitor and my chair.

clip_image002

The glasses come with a cleaning cloth and nice carrying case. I do find that I smudge them up a lot during the day. I never realized how often I adjust my glasses or scratch my nose before I bought these.

Anyway, for $20, it’s a worthy investment.

 

About the author: Phil Rack is President of MineQuest Business Analytics, LLC located in beautiful Tucson, Arizona. Phil has been a SAS language developer for more than 25 years. MineQuest provides WPS consulting and contract programming services and is an authorized reseller of WPS in North America.

Thoughts on Open Source

tucson_sunset

Unbelievable sunsets in Tucson, AZ

I recently read an article on Linux.com by Esther Shein titled “The Case for Open Source Software at Work” where she discusses the results of a survey on the use of Open Source software in companies. Pretty interesting read and it makes the argument that IT workers feel about the importance for having source code.

The elephant in the room that is never presented is how the value is measured by accounting or say purchasing. For example, how much perceived value is derived by other parts of the company because they look at the software as being free… i.e. cost free?

Individuals are different in their purchasing and use habits. Most individuals I know are driven by price as the first factor and popularity and completeness as other factors in their consideration.

I can’t recall ever seeing a survey of corporate types that measure the desire for specific software where free vs open source code is derived. I imagine that it may be measured internally by some companies but I would love to see a public survey that addresses that issue.

My own opinion, derived from looking at MS Office vs Libre Office is that quality and support is the most important driver for desktop office software. Every large company that I have consulted with use MS Office. They may use an older version but they use MS Office.

When I switch my thoughts to analytical software, I see the same thing. Corporations purchase or license software like WPS or SAS because of support and completeness. Documentation is also a big factor here too. Individuals who don’t have the financial resources to license analytical software like the aforementioned products gravitate towards free software.

I do grudgingly use R when needed but I prefer WPS over any other analytical software. It’s based on a language that I have used for 30 years and feel very comfortable with. I find it much easier to debug my code and like that if I chose to build a product, I know it will run on Windows, OS X, Linux and the mainframe.

When I factor in that I can license WPS for a bit over $3 a day on a Windows or Mac workstation (and our competitor charges just north of $41 a day for your first year) I find it compelling to have WPS in my BI stack. I can still use R and Python but the language of SAS is just too rich and broad to ignore.

About the author: Phil Rack is President of MineQuest Business Analytics, LLC located in beautiful Tucson, Arizona. Phil has been a SAS language developer for more than 25 years. MineQuest provides WPS consulting and contract programming services and is an authorized reseller of WPS in North America.

Cost of Porting Language of SAS to Python?

I recently had a discussion with a self-proclaimed data scientist who made a statement that was so broad, I had to challenge it. The discussion taking place is where a technical recruiter who was having difficulty finding SAS/WPS language developers for their marketing group was expressing some frustration. The young data scientist (still in college) jumped into the conversation with a statement “When you could execute the same applications on a open source tool like python it’s not surprising SAS is fading away.” [SIC]

Well first, I’m not real sure he understood that Python or R could not execute SAS language code. The other aspect, at least to me was the shocking naiveté of the statement simply because this data scientist never addressed the economics of the matter. So let’s do it for him.

Performing some back of the envelope calculations, say a programmer that is knowledgeable in both SAS and Python was given a contract to port 30 Language of SAS programs that average 3,000 lines of code. Let’s assume that on average the programmer can convert, test and document each program in two weeks. I’m going to estimate (probably on the low side) that the programmer is paid $85 an hour to do this conversion.

The programmers cost to convert all the programs would be 60 weeks x 40 hours a week x $85 = $204,000. One can procure a license for an 8 vcpu WPS server for ~$22,000 a year. Comparing the cost of a WPS license to spending $204,000 to convert it to Python, it would take more than nine years before you started to see a pay back on the conversion. Most ROI calculations I see in the tech industry are predicated on three years and not nine.

I just don’t see the ROI of converting existing Language of SAS code to Python unless you want to pay more money and be RAM constrained. However, I do see the ROI in converting your SAS Institute licenses to WPL licenses and execute the same code for much less. The pay back is almost immediate!

About the author: Phil Rack is President of MineQuest Business Analytics, LLC located in beautiful Tucson, Arizona. Phil has been a SAS language developer for more than 25 years. MineQuest provides WPS consulting and contract programming services and is an authorized reseller of WPS in North America.

Another Update on my Ubuntu Experiment

Environments are important. Whether it’s having the right desk and office chair, the perfect office or where you chose to live, my emotional satisfaction and motivations are impacted by my environment. It doesn’t matter whether you work solo or in a small group, your environment affects how you work and how well you work. I clearly remember driving to work on I270 in Columbus, bumper-to-bumper traffic and arriving at work in such a foul mood because of the commute. I moved to Grand Rapids, MI and there experienced cold overcast skies and lots of snow. I learned that I was suffering from SAD (Seasonal Affective Disorder.) I was able to change that for myself years ago, but the same principles apply whether you are looking at your work-flow and perhaps your workstation environment as it pertains productivity and satisfaction.

clip_image002

Lessons learned, my commute today… Home office to patio and a lot less stress.

Another month has passed since I went over to Ubuntu as my primary OS as wanted to get back to those who may be wondering how it has gone. I must say, even with a five year-old mediocre laptop, it has gone better than I thought it would. Almost every wound I have suffered has been self inflicted.

Am I as efficient and effective as with my Windows machine? The answer is “yes.” Programming in WPS and surfing the internet has been the same experience as with my Windows machines. I have gone back to my Windows PC for bookkeeping chores when I needed. I chose not to try to move that application for this experiment. I considered it too much work and out-of-scope.

Since I started this experiment, Canonical has decided that they are going to drop their GUI interface called Unity and return to Gnome. Unity it seems, was a project that was designed to “unify” the Ubuntu experience across platforms such as tablets, phones, laptops and workstations. From my reading, the decision was made to stop the financial hemorrhaging and focus on workstations and servers at the expense of phones and tablets. I actually found Unity easy to use and not a hindrance at all.

I can understand and appreciate the reasons for that decision however. Mark Shuttleworth (founder and CEO) wrote a blog post on how and why he came to that decision. Basically, Canonical is a business (not a charitable organization) and he is treating it as such. Move to your strengths and develop those areas where the revenue stream is best.

But back to my Ubuntu experiment. I could go through each application that I use and talk about the anomalies that I discovered but that would be really boring. But suffice to say, that using LibreOffice was decent and a good enough replacement for MS Word. LibreOffice Calc was good enough for my spreadsheet needs as well. I did suffer using MS OneNote a bit. I’m a huge advocate of using OneNote to keep my ideas, plans and outlines in one place. It’s one of my go-to applications.

The issue I have with OneNote is using the online version. Unexplainably, it would insert extra space between words or even letters at random. It wouldn’t do it often, but often enough to be irritating. Perhaps it is the browser I used and I should try OneNote with a different browser.

I’ve been writing a vertical market application over the last four to six months in my free time. This is a street mapping application using R, Google Maps and WPS. WPS has worked like a champ on Ubuntu Linux. Everything I threw at it worked straight away. The Eclipse workbench is exactly the same as you would see when on Windows. As a matter of fact, I like the font used by Eclipse better than the one on Windows.

clip_image004

By the way, the screen shot you see above that has the WPS Workbench displayed – this is the exact same interface you see and use with WPS Link on Linux. WPS Link is the “thin client” that World Programming distributes with their server software which allows users to interactively access the WPS software as if it was running on their desktop.

So, the question to be answered is “Can I move away from using Windows as my only OS platform for everyday use?” The answer to that is “yes.” I will most likely purchase a Dell Laptop that has Ubuntu pre-installed this summer and use that as my primary development workstation. I will keep a Windows workstation so I can test and develop on that platform as well. However, now that Skype is running decently on Ubuntu, there is no reason that I can find to not use Ubuntu. What do I give up other than forced reboots and forced updates? Not much…

About the author: Phil Rack is President of MineQuest Business Analytics, LLC located in beautiful Tucson, Arizona. Phil has been a SAS language developer for more than 25 years. MineQuest provides WPS consulting and contract programming services and is an authorized reseller of WPS in North America.

Is it time for a change and consider consulting?

Spring is often thought of as the season for change and renewal. That’s never more true than being in the desert. I was caught totally off-guard of spring in the southwest. The changes are everywhere. I love spring in the desert almost as much as I love autumn in the Midwest.

blooms

I’m pretty fortunate in that when I look outside my office window, I get to see the blooms on the right.

Which brings me to careers and trying new things. Hardly a week passes that I don’t receive a call from an individual or small organization looking to make their way as a services group consulting or creating an analytical product. The general area of analytics is just exploding and if you believe the press, it’s going to continue to do so for the next few years at least.

So, is this a good time to start an analytics consulting company? What is the competition and how much work is available? What are the rates and what is the cost to get into the industry?

All of those questions are good questions to ask. Never has the availability of good software and hardware been so affordable. One can easily put together a respectable analytics development platform for under $5,000. Along with the accessibility of affordable hardware and software, the climate is such that there are clients that can use your skills – if they are the current skill set.

For example, back in the day when I started out consulting, almost all statistical software was on the mainframe. It wasn’t realistic or even possible for me to lease a small mainframe or mini-computer to do such work. The software de jure was SPSS, SAS, BMDP and perhaps Minitab. All had considerable license costs associated with them.

Today, you can buy or build a decent workstation for just a few thousand dollars and install WPS, R and Python and have your own highly respectable analytics platform. Expect to have to add a laptop to the mix because you’re probably going to have to travel a bit when you start out, but still, well under $5,000. I’ll put a plug in for WPS right here. In comparison to our competitor, you can expect to pay approximately $14,000 more for our competitors product on a desktop for the first year than for a workstation WPS license.

As a matter of fact, you could license a copy of WPS for Windows Workstation, Mac OS X and a small Linux Server and still be $6,000 below the cost of our competitors workstation cost.

Which brings us around to getting business for start-up consulting firm. You have to have a state-of-mind that marketing your skills is as important as using your analytical skills. This is a broad topic and marketing and salesmanship is not the most natural thing in the world.

I’m not the most voracious reader anymore. Nothing like what I used to do. But I have been reading a few books that I think everyone who wants to go out and start a small business should read.

Even though no one I know likes to make cold calls, you are still going to have to follow-up with a near-cold call when you get inquires from your web site or blog. I recommend: The Conversion Code: Capture Internet Leads, Create Quality Appointments, Close More Sales

You are going to have to create a website and preferably a blog to communicate with your audience. In this case “your audience” are the companies who are looking for your consulting skills. Spend some time with: SEO 2017 Learn Search Engine Optimization With Smart Internet Marketing Strateg: Learn SEO with smart internet marketing strategies

If you are considering writing a vertical market application for resale, you don’t want to spend a lot of time trying to figure out if your idea is workable and attainable. A good read is: Sprint: How to Solve Big Problems and Test New Ideas in Just Five Days

And of course, the one that is truly important to me is: Deep Work: Rules for Focused Success in a Distracted World. If you are working alone instead of a small group, motivation can be difficult. Finding a way to stay motivated is important and there are ways to deal with fatigue and lethargy.

About the author: Phil Rack is President of MineQuest Business Analytics, LLC located in beautiful Tucson, Arizona. Phil has been a SAS language developer for more than 25 years. MineQuest provides WPS consulting and contract programming services and is an authorized reseller of WPS in North America.

An Update on my Ubuntu Experiment

Just an update on my Ubuntu experiment that I wrote about in the last blog post.  I do have most everything installed that I want for the experiment. I’m going to use Ubuntu 16.04 as much as possible and only revert back to Windows when absolutely necessary.

So far, I’ve went back to my Windows workstation for QuickBooks to update some accounting information. I guess I could probably put QuickBooks into the cloud but at this point I’m going to hold off on that application until I get other things tested.

I have to admit this laptop is on the heavy side but it has a really decent battery. On a full-charge I get around 7 hours. My 17” I7 Toshiba laptop gets maybe three hours and that’s if I put it into Eco Mode. The Dell e6420 also has an NFC hotspot and a finger print reader. I’m not using either one of those and don’t think there’s a driver for those hardware elements either.

I do have WPS, R, Python and R Studio all working well. I’m using Thunderbird for my email application and LibreOffice (using it to write this post) for my writing and documentation chores. I’m looking for a OneDrive connector that works seamlessly but so far, I’m still searching.

Just for kicks, I did try using Microsoft Office Online. This is the web version of office. It seems that I tend to skip letters in words or Office online would randomly adds spaces between words in my text. I’m not sure why but it seems to be constantly saving whatever I’ve entered. Meaning not saving in say 5 minute intervals or something similar. Could be something with Firefox too.

One thing I need to mention is that the performance is good. I have run dozens of WPS programs and they all have executed in a reasonable amount of time. I live in a world where the processing I do is measured in data sets of 10 million or less for my development. Using WPS on this laptop is a good experience and processes these datasets quickly.

I did get two emails over the week asking about WPS on Ubuntu. WPS does run fine on Ubuntu and I have no complaints on that. One emailer asked about the price of WPS on Linux and whether it was really cost effective as a workstation product.

WPL licenses WPS on Linux as a server product. You don’t get workstation pricing on Linux. Workstation pricing is only for Windows and Macintosh products. If you are expecting a Linux Workstation to be as cost effective (i.e. priced the same) as a Windows or Macintosh Workstation, then you will be disappointed.

I suppose that one could always license a small WPS Linux Server (2LCPU and say 8GB of RAM) and run it in a virtual machine using Xen or Virtual Box and still be less expensive than our competitor’s Windows workstation pricing. But if you’re a developer, you probably need to think about development and test platforms quite a bit.

Here’s a suggestion. Say you are a developer and are looking to develop a vertical market application. You could easily license both Macintosh and Windows workstation products and still be under $2500 a year. Of course, you have the cost of a MacBook or Mac Workstation to add on to that, but it is still very doable and capable as a development machine. Actually, a Mac Mini could work nicely for an Apple development machine. Just make sure you don’t buy the newer model that is not upgradeable since they soldered the RAM in place enforcing planned obsolescence.

The Macintosh product license could suffice for developing and testing code that is to be executed on Linux/Unix computing platforms. Of course, the Windows product license would do the same for Workstation and Server products.

I have taken a set of macro’s that I have in a library and compiled them under OS X. I’ve then copied them over to the Linux machine and it executes flawlessly. This is not an exhaustive test by any means but it does demonstrate what can be accomplished using a Macintosh Workstation. Perhaps a more complete Proof-of-Concept should be attempted and we could certainly arrange an evaluation for those products if you desire.

And finally, one more thought. If you are a developer creating a vertical market application and your target platforms are Windows, Linux and OS X and you need to have WPS Link and WPS Communicate for connecting to a remote server, then you will need a Linux Server or a Windows Server for test and development. If your product does not require pushing code that’s to be executed on the remote server, then just the Mac and Windows Workstations will likely suffice.

About the author: Phil Rack is President of MineQuest Business Analytics, LLC located in beautiful Tucson, Arizona. Phil has been a SAS language developer for more than 25 years. MineQuest provides WPS consulting and contract programming services and is an authorized reseller of WPS in North America.

I’ve always been a fool for a bargain…

My last blog post, I was pretty incensed with Microsoft and Windows 10. I just don’t understand some of their decisions as it pertains to professional developers who use their tools and have to struggle with how they force upgrades and perform reboots. I’m still upset so I’ve decided to try a little experiment.

I recently came across a five or six-year-old Dell laptop that was priced (I thought anyway) on eBay at an incredible price. This laptop is a Dell E6420 with an Intel I7 CPU and 4GB of RAM laptop for sale at $150 or best offer. Doing a quick perusal online, this laptop has a screen resolution of 1600×900, an NVidia graphics card and with a 9-cell battery which can get (supposedly) up to 10 hours of battery life. Hoping I was not making a rash decision, I decided to give it a try and make it part of my collection.

This little machine was missing a power adapter and a hard drive. It did power up on battery power so I know it works. I found a power adapter on eBay for $20 and I have an older 500GB HDD sitting in a file drawer. I think I might have a couple of 4GB SODIMM’s somewhere that I tore out of a Mac Mini. If I can’t find those SODIMM’s, then I will buy some RAM online. I may also discard the DVD drive and replace it with a small SSD down the road. I can’t remember the last time I used a DVD in a computer so it’s easy to let that go.

If you are like me, you probably have hundreds of cables, plugs and other accessories laying around and at least 20% of it you have no idea what it belongs to. Yet, you’re afraid to get rid of it because it might be something you need down the road. I guess that is one of the few advantages of being a hoarder. i.e. being able to talk yourself into almost any purchase!

So, being the Froogle individual consciousness consumer I am, I ended up winning this machine at best price of $80. It sounds so counter-intuitive to spend money on five-year-old piece of technology but it does give me the opportunity to try an experiment that I’ve wanted to do for the last year. Now motivated by Microsoft, I decided to just do it.

I’m sure many of you have seen the Dell XPS 13 laptop running Linux. It’s fairly pricey bit of kit but it does get rave reviews. It’s obvious that the XPS 13 is also more powerful. I’m also intrigued by the thought of trying to setup an environment where I’m not using OS X or a Windows environment at all. So right now, I’m not concerned with getting a machine with the ultimate in performance. I’m also a bit concerned with working on such a small screen for long periods.

I’m not at all confident that all the programs exist that I want (or need) to use are available on Linux. But, this is an interesting experiment non-the-less.

The idea behind this concept is to see if I can set up an everyday working environment for writing, programming and performing desktop analytics. I want to be able to plug this into a large monitor and use it as a typical workstation when I’m not lugging it around.

Also, I am not adverse paying money for software. I’m not a believer that everything I put on a PC or laptop with Ubuntu must be free or open source. I do expect to purchase a fair amount of software including UltraEdit.

Initial Software

I’m jumping ahead here because I’m going to have to solve some issues with the Ubuntu Install. I want to make sure the trackpad and power options work. Probably be wrestling with the webcam as well. These seem to be issues I found when Googling the internet. Update: the only thing I can’t get to work properly is the sound from the laptops speakers. I can get sound via Bluetooth, HDMI and the headphone jack. I am not sure how much time I want to spend on the sound issue since I typically use a Logitech USB headset or Bluetooth headset from SoundPEATS. Specifically, the model QY7 if you want some quality sound out of a set of ear buds.

I will post back on how this works out. In the meantime, if you have not yet downloaded WPS v3.3, I strongly suggest you grab that release and step up your game!

About the author: Phil Rack is President of MineQuest Business Analytics, LLC located in beautiful Tucson, Arizona. Phil has been a SAS language developer for more than 25 years. MineQuest provides WPS consulting and contract programming services and is an authorized reseller of WPS in North America.

Why Microsoft? Why?

As a business user and knowledge worker, I am extremely dependent upon my workstation and laptop. Like many of my readers, we spend a great deal of time developing a work-flow for analytics as well as business processes for running our business. When I am forced to accept updates and my systems go south, I must spend time fixing this. That’s why I get so frustrated with Microsoft.

The other thing that has really gotten my goat is that ads are now starting to appear in my OS. There are ads in the file explorer window! I want a clean, non-cluttered interface and OS. I don’t want to be hampered by an OS that makes me lose concentration of crap popping up to distract me.

So, I have decided to embark on an experiment. I’m going to setup a used Dell laptop to use as my primary machine running Linux. If after 60 days or so, I will decide if I make the permanent move away from MS for my full-time machine and only use the Windows workstation for testing code.

About the author: Phil Rack is President of MineQuest Business Analytics, LLC located in beautiful Tucson, Arizona. Phil has been a SAS language developer for more than 25 years. MineQuest provides WPS consulting and contract programming services and is an authorized reseller of WPS in North America.

Technical Document – Post Installation Steps for WPS Workstations

We just finished updating a document for WPS users, specifically those on the Windows Platforms entitled, “Configuring Your WPS Workstation after Installing WPS v3.3.” This document helps those who are evaluating the WPS product on Windows learn about and install some features that is specific to WPS.

The document is short, only 14 pages but touches on modifying the WPS.CFG file as well as installing R and Python to get the greatest amount of utility out of WPS. If you have installed WPS on a Windows Workstation and are looking to get additional utility out of your WPS software, this document is for you.

To download the file, click here or download at:

http://minequest.com/downloads/Post-Installation-Steps-for-WPS-Workstations.pdf (1008KB)

About the author: Phil Rack is President of MineQuest Business Analytics, LLC located in beautiful Tucson, Arizona. Phil has been a SAS language developer for more than 25 years. MineQuest provides WPS consulting and contract programming services and is an authorized reseller of WPS in North America.

Why WPS v3.3 is important

A few weeks ago, I posted a blog about the new release of WPS v3.3. Quite a few people and companies have been waiting for this release and I want to talk about why this is such an historic release. I also want to write about what this release means to data scientists.

First, this release is truly a blockbuster. With the Interop for R and Python modules, this is the first time as far as I am aware, where a software product allows a developer to easily use the Language of SAS, R and Python to implement a program, project or product – all in one development environment. As data science has evolved, R and Python have become more popular but BOTH lack the data management capabilities of WPS. With WPS, you not only get the language of SAS to process your data, but you also get a multitude of database engines to read\write and access data in the most popular databases.

The beauty of such integration is ease of development. If you have been a developer for as long as I have, you know the time demands of learning a new development environment. Now, with WPS v3.3 a developer can stay within a single development environment for all of their analytical development needs. The developer doesn’t have to learn an R IDE to write, test and execute R code. The same can be said for Python. The Python interface with WPS means having development control as well as execution control of python programs or similarly R programs.

Organizations want to take advantage of R and Python integration because it allows them to create and expand programs and projects. It will quickly become apparent for third-party developers, i.e. those who want to create vertical market applications that these two additional languages radically increase their tool sets going forward. For many, it also means running production jobs that are self-contained, meaning control and execution is controlled by WPS and not a bunch of separate tasks or processes having to be handled individually.

I have been fortunate to have had access to Alpha and Beta builds of WPS for v3.3 and was totally blown away by the improvements and additions that I saw. For example:

  • The data step is faster.
  • Inclusion of the Python programming language.
  • Implementation of Proc IML.
  • Faster data engine access for many databases including multi-threaded loading.
  • More complete graphics output in statistical procedures.
  • PDF support

But what makes this one of the most compelling releases is the integration of R and Python. With Python specifically, one now has access to executing Machine Learning code from WPS. I’m sure many of you who read this blog are involved in credit scoring, fraud detection, anti-money laundering, market basket analysis, loyalty programs and other real-time analytics. With Python and OpenGL and the CUDA libraries, one can now perform incredibly high speed processing of data on your desktop/server GPU.

When looking at the breadth of the WPS offering, it’s amazing how much is included for the data scientist who needs to work in multiple languages supporting data analytics. With all the database engines (including Hadoop), WPS Graphics, IML, R, Python, WPS Statistics, and WPS Time Series, I almost faint thinking what the cost would be for something similar from our competitor SAS Institute.

The other aspect of WPS v3.3 that is so enticing is the licensing. There are two components to this that deserve discussion. The first, is that Data Service Providers (DSP’s) can make use of this software to develop and provide statistical and mathematical models for third parties. Let’s face it, many if not most organizations lack the expertise to develop these models for companies.

The second component is the creation of Vertical Market Applications using the WPS software. The absolute reasonable cost of the software is a driving factor in being able to create and resell your VMA at a price that small, mid-size and large companies can all afford. Using WPS as the basis for your VMA is advantageous because you’re not beholden to some other organization requiring you to pay partnership fees for access to the software and marketing. I think you would be shocked to learn about how competitive and perhaps ruthless a software vendor can be when it comes to introducing and pricing a competing VMA.

If you want to learn more about the latest release of WPS v3.3, especially as it pertains to workstations, read the previous blog post and download the latest brochure for v3.3. You can request an evaluation of WPS v3.3 by contacting info@minequest.com or filling out our evaluation or quote request form here.

I hope everyone had a Merry Christmas and wishing everyone a Happy New Year.

 

About the author: Phil Rack is President of MineQuest Business Analytics, LLC located in beautiful Tucson, Arizona. Phil has been a SAS language developer for more than 25 years. MineQuest provides WPS consulting and contract programming services and is an authorized reseller of WPS in North America.